WorldHaus: Idealab Invents Super-Cheap House

As a tiny house enthusiast I think it is important to look at all options around the world. We can learn from other people and I like to share as many of these ideas as I can.

Tom Bennett recently sent me to WorldHaus a company that has come up with an affordable home for the masses (outside the U.S.). And by affordable they mean $1,500 per house. It’s called the WorldHaus; it is a 220 square foot home built of interlocking compressed earth-bricks, steel and polystyrene roof panels, and concrete.

WorldHaus

The bulk of the materials are assembled on site and the house can be built in 10 days. They provide solid, weather-tight housing for about half the price of a normal brick-and-mortar home.

interior of house

Read more: http://worldhaus.com/
http://www.businessinsider.com/worldhaus-cheap-house-2012-

http://letheatredemoncerveau.blogspot.com/2012/02/worldhaus-for-families-in-need.html

40 Comments WorldHaus: Idealab Invents Super-Cheap House

  1. Monica

    Have these companies ever thought of donating time & resources to help 3 World countries, or Haiti to help them rebuild? These sound perfect for things like that! I’d personally love a tiny house, but my daughters wouldn’t lol, maybe when they’re on their own I’ll build 1!

    Reply
  2. robin yates

    a very interesting video with a big market for the Philippines where poor housing is of a very low quality

    Reply
  3. Peyote Short

    I’ve noticed they commonly count labor as free when designing low cost tiny houses.

    Yes, dirt is, by definition, dirt cheap. But the labor to form it into bricks and make walls out of it is considerable.

    Reply
    1. karen

      That’s why we need to build community! “many hands make light work” right? Hold work parties, make plans to share labour with other individuals who have projects to complete, too…it’s time to step back from the dollar economy thinking that limits what we think we can do, and start sharing our resources and energy with each other!

      Reply
    1. David L Alexander

      Yes, and you’d have “artistic options” if you lived in a part of the world where cobs were in sufficient supply. The Philippines, to use an example given, is not such a place, at least not everywhere. But dirt and clay *is* everywhere, and service labor in that country is very cheap. What if a city or banangay (borough) could easily head up an effort to gradually raze a slum area, and replace it with these dwellings, allowing workers to trade labor for ownership?

      Reply
  4. Paige

    I think this is wonderful. It would be great to see it used in a mission project.

    Also, Kent, when are you going to post your faircompanies interview. I watched it a few days ago and it is great. Hope you weren’t planning to keep that a secret.

    Reply
    1. Kent Griswold

      Hi Paige, I have the interview in the About section of the blog. I’m a little gun shy about self promotion. You think I should put it up then? -Kent

      Reply
        1. MJ

          I second that! Kent, you are one of the contemporary pioneers in the tiny house movement and I don’t think it’s blowing your own horn in a bad way to let others get to know you in what is becoming a crowded field – in many ways because of you!

          Reply
  5. Julia

    This sounds interesting, but are there any pictures of the interior? And are these available in the US?

    Reply
    1. Kent Griswold

      Hi Julia, follow the links above for some interior photos. I’ll try to put some up here too later today.

      Reply
  6. Andy Campbell

    I Agree with Peyote Short about the labour. In the western world there would be $20.000+ in labour costs in that 10 days.

    Reply
  7. liz goertz

    I dont think any one solution works every where. I would be concerned about earth quake damage to this structure, also all of the concrete used, which has to be brought in.The thing it has working for it is thermal mass, but it seems like a lot of thinking inside the box to me. Every climate and region will have its own issues and I like the Idea of looking at the traditional houses and local vernacular to improve upon and build with locally sourced materials.
    this looks like the solution of western trained traditional architects to me.

    Reply
  8. Meg

    Granted, they are cheap, but “house” seems like a pretty generous term. ‘Cell’ might be more accurate.
    I think in the 21st century, no matter where you live, ethical housing strategies need to include responsible cooking, hygiene + water and waste disposal/sanitation access.

    Reply
    1. San

      Agreed. My church built homes this size for 675.00. They used plywood and they were elevated off the ground. The plywood slabs were easy to ship, the roof angled upward to allow rain run-off also making one side of the house have a higher ceiling. The front had large window. The shape and it being off the ground by about a foot made it NOT resemble a jail cell. And less than half as expensive.

      Reply
      1. ImReady

        San, you said your church built houses similar to this for $675.00….would you have any more information about this? Maybe some pictures…some drawings, just info as to how they are built, what they consist of. It would be interesting. Plus, how long ago? Thanks

        Reply
  9. Joe

    I’ve seen jail cells that are nicer than these. We Americans are so spoiled when our jail cells are better than some peoples homes. Sad…

    Reply
  10. alice h

    It’s easy to keep clean, secure, critter and weather proof.(Not sure how disaster proof.)It may look like a cell to some people but it could be a huge improvement for others. Kitchen and sanitation facilities don’t need to be inside an individual dwelling to be functional or ecologically responsible. Sometimes it’s even the opposite. Some people may be cooking individually or communally in a separate area for whatever reasons and it may be more practical to have a central washing/toilet facility as well. A lot depends on culture, climate, available resources and a host of other factors.

    Reply
  11. Barb

    I think it is a wonderful home. Wasn’t that an outhouse shown in the video? I dont see a water supply, but perhaps that is not uncommon and there is a communal water supply nearby.
    To call it a “cell” and “unartistic” is a characteristically American viewpoint.

    American’s live in overindulgent, grotesquely selfish mansions, me included, compared to the vast majority of people on this planet. It seems that these homeowners are happy with their home . Compared to many living conditions that exist today around the world, it is a beautiful, solid home. I think the company that is investing time and energy to create affordable housing around the world is worthy of our admiration and thanks. Well done – a beautiful home.

    Reply
  12. jipsi

    THIS IS WORTHY OF AN AWARD!! What a wonderful little house, and so much safer, cleaner, more comfortable and attractive than the poor building they had to subsist in, before. It would be cool to have been able to see a pic of the family’s lot and ‘house’ prior to this new ‘upgrade’, because we Americans just LOVE ‘before and after’ stories, but I can imagine it was a bleak, unhospitable affair, in comparison! THANK YIU for sharing such an inspiring story (and the video is a MUST SEE! :-)

    Reply
  13. jipsi

    to Liz Goertz: as to building quake-resistant hiusing, I’d say the single stiry nature of these already mskes it a much safer option than many of the current (and more ‘sturdy’) multi-floor apartnent buildings. If it all came down it would STILL be safer than if it were an 8-story building, with so much LESS in the way of rubble, right? It’s also a lot easier to bug out of, in an emergency (fire, quake, etc),than something with a lot of floors, stairs, people-crowded hallways…
    As to it looking like a jail cell: that’s our Americanism showing… These are to be ‘better homes’, not an implementation of Western standards to replace their cultures! In many 3rd world countries, it is ‘traditional’ for families to live in one-room homes, and many eschew Western furnishings in favor of their floor habit (for seating, sleeping, even cooking,etc.). That these have ‘real’ windiws, doors, not to mention surface floors and available electricity, make them, in fact, A LUXURY, for many!! ;-)

    Reply
  14. jipsi

    and a PS: We need to remember that, in most of the 3rd world countries (ie: parts of India, Africa, Asia, former-Soviet Union countries, and Indonesian islands), an average working man’s income can be as little (or lower!) than $2000 a YEAR! So I’m a little sad that, altho’ incredibly cheap’ by OUR standards, these little ‘modern houses’ come at a price many, many of their country’s population will still find unattainable…
    (sorry so many typos in my post(s); fumble fingers on my kindle’s little touch keys = a lot of ‘oopses’)

    Reply
    1. Gonzo

      I agree with you completely! The negative comments made by others see this type of construction crude and unappealing, but it is very straight forward and durable as well as lower impact to the planet than our traditional western methods of home construction!Which by the way is very wasteful,unefficient and costly! Not to mention trying to comply with code! We should embrace the KISS (KEEP IT SIMPLE STUPID)rule!These type of homes, timy and more natural materials, are healthier for people and planet! Keep an opem mind everyone! Peace!

      Reply
  15. winnie

    jipsi, respectfully I will disagree with you regarding disaster circumstances. Once one is buried waist deep that is deep enough to be trapped for good, so it doesn’t matter if it’s a one story home or a multistory for the person trapped.

    What I see these structures serving well for is for storage of much needed food supplies and other things in typical situations, but often the locals will find the way to best use them. The respondent above who suggested looking at vernacular architecture and then suggesting adaptations was quite astute. There are numbers of studies showing the external solutions foisted upon peoples of these locations not being really functional for all the reasons these respondents have suggested – and yes, even those in poverty have an eye for beauty and know a cell when they see one!

    Reply
    1. Kent Griswold

      I don’t know for sure. Go to their website and see. I’m just fairly certain that they would not meet code in most areas.

      Reply
  16. Pingback: WorldHaus Idealab invents $2000 House | ovaspray

  17. UNDEAD

    can we call this a house.looks like room for me.btw nice job for the team.such a good work.may god bless u!!

    Reply
  18. ImReady

    I think this kind of a house is a mansion to MANY people of the world. Don’t knock it just we are more fortunate. Surely no one has any trouble understanding this, and why would you make unkind comments about it. So what if it looks like a jail cell to us. To them, it is their mansion. So what if it doesn’t have the “artistic” look to it. It is far better than a cardboard box. All the men you see making this building might be homeless themselves.
    Show a little kindness.

    Reply
  19. vidyadhara

    How are these earthen compreesed blocks are water proof? Is this just a locally available mud or anything else along with cememnt or with sort of some chemicals?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>